korpi: (chaotic good)
Oh god, I just had a brilliant, revolutionary thought. Sometimes when an author adds something to [their work] that might be read as homoerotic, they might be thinking that it's...

wait for it...

just as relevant to the story as all the other elements they have added. Like, even in a world where "yaoi fangirls" and "yuri fanboys"* don't exist as recognizable groups to "pander"...? The gay might still be there! Besides, I have the strangest feeling that sometimes even the fan-pandering type of gay can grow into something more serious. Just a... is it a "hunch" if it's based on direct evidence?

Or maybe I'm just crazy.

Not that there aren't two sides to every argument. Shows that use gay for titillation far outnumber the ones that don't. But despite what people seem to think, instead of being happy about those meaningless moments, some of us find that annoying.

Point is, the next time someone dismisses something perfectly logical and in-character as a "nod to the fangirls", I will punch them through the internet.

*because these are the only two groups in existence, as you know that gay is only a heterosexual fantasy
korpi: (may hope be born anew)
If you say no female author has ever published a masterpiece because they only focus on petty things like relationships


You are talking on the basis that works focusing on things other than relationships are the pinnacle of literature, and do not realize that you yourself are just one viewpoint among many, and your truth is not the one truth upon which to pass judgement onto others


And therefore are a fucking moron.
korpi: (a hero's straying from the just)
Whoever OK'd Noah's battle strategy or thought it was a good idea in the first place, please step up because I've got something to tell you

WITH MY FISTS

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags