Entry tags:
euro! euro!
Most of the songs in the Eurovision song contest are rather dull. *cough* Most of them are even, dare I say, very bad, even given the usual quality of the songs in said contest. Lordi gets a thumbs-up from me because, well, Lordi, but the others? Nah.
Then in comes Lithuania.
You know that a performance is going to be special when it's by six male artists who are all failed former Eurovision participants. The song itself is brilliant. Most the lyrics consist of "we are the winners of Eurovision/so vote for us now" or something like that. They were silly on the stage, and the song ended with a very loud "VOTE!" with all the men holding up their hands in a V sign.
If they get through the semi-finals, I'm seriously going to vote for them. Blame propaganda.
[edit] Aaaand Lithuania got to the finals! ♥
Then in comes Lithuania.
You know that a performance is going to be special when it's by six male artists who are all failed former Eurovision participants. The song itself is brilliant. Most the lyrics consist of "we are the winners of Eurovision/so vote for us now" or something like that. They were silly on the stage, and the song ended with a very loud "VOTE!" with all the men holding up their hands in a V sign.
If they get through the semi-finals, I'm seriously going to vote for them. Blame propaganda.
[edit] Aaaand Lithuania got to the finals! ♥

no subject
(Euroviisujen funktio on olla tosi yleismaailmallista musiikkia, joka ei kerro yhtään mitään maasta itsestään. (Oliko se Tahiti jonka biisissä laulettiin Havaijista?) Tuo oli yhteenveto puolen tunnin kiivaasta keskustelusta Euroviisujen historiasta teknisen piirustuksen tunnilla. XD)
no subject
(Ja jos sallisitte, haluaisin väittää vastaan - Euroviisujen TODELLINEN funktio on tuoda maailman korviin kaikkein surkeinta paskaa mitä voi vielä "musiikki" -sanalla jotenkin kuvailla. Siis, levittää huonoa musiikkia. Joskus sinne tosin sattuu eksymään ihan hyväkin kappale. Kerran kymmenessä vuodessa.)